x�+� � | endstream Date: 20 décembre 2005: Source: ACLU link, and Archived link at the Internet Archive. 173 0 obj <>stream 9 0 obj <>stream endstream Dieu), mais un « designer » . endstream Judge John E. Jones III's decision barring Dover Area School District from mentioning intelligent design in a ninth-grade biology class. endobj endstream 109 0 obj <>stream 116 0 obj <>stream }"� v. Dover Area School Board (2005), a controversial district court decision … x��?�0���)n�y���8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h��l�=������H'�7���i�o^z�:i� �ܹ�*+�u����72�p���R��lxj��0w���Lk��SM?�"� x��?�0���)n�y���:�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h��\Xߑ N p�7(�~�վy�-��&�rk�����an?c��ȴZ�q��k|KG�Y�����A2w���F���~ X"� ���3����E�{�ƷTs��E��>D�0w�ls���F���~F�"� ��3��L��{�ƷTq4�<5}��$+.��ߨ�T�Q"� x����@D��Sj�r��b�bA%�6����we2�$g&������4R���q���);�B*��$�E�-r�#���7��e#گ`�UY���~�8���Z�q��kz�'�]��#���A��2�Í�@5� �"� endstream x�+� � | 74 0 obj <>stream endobj endstream x����@D��Sjܻ������$[X�\F >�ߕ�I&9�jz���S1".v^�ux���Q��;� ΦJ`?�j߼̖M�~V�sIUV��0��1Loh�q���2��yj����A��2���JO5� D�"� endobj endstream endobj x��?�0���)nԡ�^)�8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������3��;���H'�ϐ�~�վy�-�~k뜪� endstream endobj 78 0 obj <>stream endobj endstream endobj endobj 271 0 obj <>stream endstream x�+� � | endobj endobj x����@D��Sjܻ������$[X�\F >�ߕ�$'9�jz���S1".2/�:Q� �gS%���i�o^f�&i� �¹�*+�s����7�Q�8�p�o��X�yj� �9�.bs���F���~E�"� 248 0 obj <>stream endobj endobj x��?�0���)n�y���8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h�X��=�础(��qAk����#���+@oY'�7ae�K���_����az#�j����-U�f�����A��2���JO5� ��"W 2005) win’s view. x����@D��Sjܻ,�b�bA%�6����wer�IN&���w��X�� ��l,�%��( x�+� � | endstream endstream 237 0 obj <>stream endstream x�+� � | x�+� � | x�+� � | x�+� � | 265 0 obj <>stream endstream x�+� � | endstream 134 0 obj <>stream endobj x�+� � | endstream x����@D��Sjܻ,�����$[X�\F >����I&9�����S�".va�:�N��(��qA����?�j�>�u�}Vƹ��j��_���r���0��%�e�#\��,����y��Tyj��:"3 x�+� � | endobj x�+� � | endobj endstream x�+� � | endobj x��?�0���)n�y���8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h�X��=��A���H'�7�m?�j߼��u�~Vֹ�*+�u����72�p���R��lxj�x`1w���Lk��SM? %���� x��?�0���)n�y���8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h�X��=���j���H'�7�m?�j߼��u�~Vֹ�*+�u����72�p���R��lxj� k0w���Lk��SM?�"� 28 0 obj <>stream x�+� � | endobj 154 0 obj <>stream endstream endstream You can search category or keyword to quickly sift through the free Kindle books that are available. 65 0 obj <>stream 261 0 obj <>stream 89 0 obj <>stream endstream Q��aA�y�Í��7/�e�߈5�6�� endobj endstream endstream x��?�0���)n�y���8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h�X��=��!Q� ��"����GZ�W�޲N�o��:�Te��s���F����=\�[�8��OM ���i�oTz��"� 127 0 obj <>stream 47 0 obj <>stream x����@D��Sjܻ,�����$[X�\F >�ߕ�I&9�jz���S�".va�:Q� �gS%����7� �e��߄�q.�� 172 0 obj <>stream endobj 223 0 obj <>stream x�+� � | endstream 96 0 obj <>stream x�+� � | x�+� � | 208 0 obj <>stream endobj v. Dover Area School Board (2005), a controversial district court decision about the teaching of intelligent design in public schools. endobj 104 0 obj <>stream 135 0 obj <>stream endobj It was featured on the cover of Time magazine,1 its study was seemingly endorsed by the President of the United States,2 and it became one of the most talked-about 264 0 obj <>stream endstream 20 0 obj <>stream Ce fichier et sa description proviennent de Wikimedia Commons. x�+� � | endobj 190 0 obj <>stream 226 0 obj <>stream endstream 220 0 obj <>stream x�+� � | x����@D��Sj�pﲰ����$[X�\F >�ߕ�I&9�jz���1".v^�ux������ �g-���i�o^f�F�_źpNUe�s���Ff�"��=\�[�9��"OM��$�\���Q驦B�"� endobj en español In the legal case Kitzmiller v. Dover, tried in in a Harrisburg, PA, Federal District Court, “intelligent design” was found Decision in Kitzmiller v. 24 0 obj <>stream endstream 218 0 obj <>stream endobj endobj x��?�0���)nԡ�^)�8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������3��; ߑ N (b�!�9�H�}� x��?�0���)n�y���:�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h37\Xߑ N p��Q�~�վy�-��&���IUV��0��1LodZ-�8��5����9_�����A2w���F���~ �"� It would become an important test for the constitutionality of teaching Intelligent Design in public schools. case. endstream endstream endobj endstream H��Vђ�6}�+�h:�����6i:��΄NH�} �z%��m?��J���tvXHW��{ιz��S*V��v�{3�g"�f"��F�HL��T̟z�X�5/�߾e���^:�ofa�J�c1M&�l�w�I��eȏ��o�i��u}�'IHa�ԥlJ��J��:a*�_�b-hg�SF��q:����.�O��3_Y������,�Ƴӆ�yC�7��Bn-�;���ۊ��Ls>�����(�vJo�2�%�O8�r�Vh�#U�.���ʗ0���$��s��a����X0�. 16 0 obj <>stream 111 0 obj <>stream endstream endobj INTRODUCTION The year 2005 was the year the theory of intelligent design (ID) made the headlines. x��?�0���)n�y���8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h�X��=��A���H'�7�m?�j߼��u�~Vֹ�*+�u����72�p���R��lxj� e1w���Lk��SM? The Supreme Court 12 Kitzmiller v. Dover Area Sch. %PDF-1.4 endstream endobj endstream x����@D��Sj�pﲰ����$[X�\F >�ߕ�I&9�jz���1".v^�ux������;� �&Z`?�j߼̖�j��uᜪ� endstream endstream endstream 5 0 obj <>stream This paper explores the soundness of Judge Jones’ decision and investigates parallels between the McLean and 184 0 obj <>stream x����@D��Sjܻ,�b�bA%�6����wer�IN&���w��X�� ��-�%�1�(��aA���"79�D�C���;�Q��Xk�����qi?���H�Z�i��.�%�����KI��u7*��ɰ"1 230 0 obj <>stream 233 0 obj <>stream endobj x����@D��Sj�ܻ�K*I���!#����d�I�L=h���">���'�7p�!���ׯz�:i� +�}R%�:��gl�72�p��5�����,�T���`� Y~���FE��~�"� endstream x����@D��Sjܻ,�b�bA%�6����wer�IN&���w��X�� ��l,�%�Q��(��a�5����M�94/�c�߈UnmT��9.�g���V�8�w߅�Dq��U����XzHZ\筻Q騦F�"� 0[6��*֙s�*+�u����7R�p�����lxj� m1w���Lk��SM? 152 0 obj <>stream endobj 255 0 obj <>stream 144 0 obj <>stream x�+� � | endstream endstream endobj This is just one of the solutions for you to be successful. x�+� � | 146 0 obj <>stream endstream x��=�0���WܨC��mqTq`�����B0���[�\r�s�CM�b�F)}�ܲ�x���m!BGi�"�9�u#���+�lو�+XY�EUV��0��1Noh�p���2�ɜ/����a� uq���Fe��~ "� endobj 100 0 obj <>stream endobj endstream 267 0 obj <>stream endstream 04cv2688 Plaintiffs :: v. : Judge Jones: DOVER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT and : DOVER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT : BOARD OF DIRECTORS, : Defendants. endstream endstream endobj 94 0 obj <>stream x��?�0���)n�y���8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h�X��=���eߑ N (bo��~�վy�-��&��sIUV��0��1LodZ-�8��5�����,���Nc� Yq���F���~@"� "� 2d 707 (M.D. x��?�0���)n�y���8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h�X��=��Agߑ N (bo��~�վy�-��&��sIUV��0��1LodZ-�8��5�����,����@c� Yq���F���~"� x�+� � | 13 0 obj <>stream Get Free Traipsing Into Evolution Intelligent Design And The Kitzmiller V Dover Decision can be your partner. x��?�0���)nԡ�^[�8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������X3�8wx���c �#A�@P�>E���#���+�n٪��XgΩ����an?c��0V/�8��5�%��9]��C\`� ��Lk��SM?"� endobj endobj x�+� � | endstream endobj x��?�0���)nԡ�^)�:�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������3˹�x����!�#A�@�b�����V��`�lT�U�skUUV��0��1Lo�F/�8��5�%��9[��\�����2���JO5� B"� 240 0 obj <>stream endobj endobj Le principal enjeu des plaignants pour ce procès était de démontrer que le dessein intelligent était assimilé à la religion , étant donné que ce courant de pensée ne mentionne pas clairement un « créateur » (i.e. endstream Dover Area School District policy requiring the teaching of intelligent design. endstream PDF of decision hosted on Wikimedia Commons at File:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District.pdf . x�+� � | 149 0 obj <>stream endobj x��?�0���)nԡ�^[�8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������X3�8wx���� ߑ N (b�"�r��V��`�lU�U�3�TUV��0��1Lo�p����ќ.���F0wS\���Q驦�"� x��?�0���)n�y���8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h�X��=������H'�7�m?�j߼��u�~Vֹ�*+�u����72�p���R��lxj� c1w���Lk��SM?�"� "� 98 0 obj <>stream x��?�0���)nԡ�^)�8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������3��:�#A�@P�>��-�H�}� 235 0 obj <>stream endobj endstream endobj endstream endstream x�+� � | x����@D��Sjܻ������$[X�\F >�ߕ�I&9�jz���S1".v^�ux���aQ� �gS%���i�o^f�&i� �¹�*+�s����7�Q�8�p�o���<5}����A��2���JO5� B�"� endobj endstream 60 0 obj <>stream }8�80I����`!����[�\r��.��������ZK�,g'x���q��#�8�F�.w�#���+�n٪����"�*+�u����7Rkp����ќ-���"�;贸Lk��SM? endobj x��?�0���)nԡ�^[�8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������X3�8wx���# ߑ N (b�"�r��V��`�lU�U�3�TUV��0��1Lo�p����ќ.���Fc� ��Lk��SM?i"� TAMMY KITZMILLER, et al. endstream Cliquer sur une date et heure pour voir le fichier tel qu'il était à ce moment-là. 280 0 obj<>/ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI]/Font<>>>/CropBox[0 0 612 792]/MediaBox[0 0 612 792]/Rotate 0>> Taille de cet aperçu JPG pour ce fichier PDF : 463 × 599 pixels. endstream endobj endobj x����@D��Sjܻ��b�bA%�6����wer�IN&���w��X�� �f�[J.��(��aA�ck�g9�D�C��0;6Q��Xe�FUY���~&?���Z�i��.�%�����K��u޺��j��"+ endstream endobj T"� endstream endobj endstream ��3��L��{�ƷTq4�<5}��$+.��ߨ�T��"� 276 0 obj <>stream 67 0 obj <>stream PDF, EPUB, MOBI, DOC, etc). endobj endobj The Truth About the Dover Intelligent Design Trial Discovery Institute November 15, 2007 Intelligent Design Responses to Dover Ruling. endstream endstream endobj x�+� � | : MEMORANDUM OPINION December 20, 2005 INTRODUCTION: On October 18, 2004, the Defendant Dover Area School Board of Directors passed by a 6-3 vote the following resolution: Students will be made aware of gaps/problems in Darwin’s theory and of other … 77 0 obj <>stream x����@D��Sjܻ������$[X�\F >�ߕ�I&9�jz���S1".v^�ux���Q endobj endobj x��?�0���)n�y�-�8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������3��:ߑ N (b���~�վy�-���&�r璪���an?c���F-�8��5����9[�����Atq���F���~�"� endstream endstream the curriculum of public schools ever since the Edwards decision, which ruled that ―creation science‖ was a violation of the the Establishment Clause. endobj endobj x����@D��Sjܻ,�����$[X�\F >�ߕ�$'9�jz���S�".�0l�=e�ArQ� �gS%����7� �e��߄�q.�� V"� 243 0 obj <>stream endobj en español In the legal case Kitzmiller v. Dover, tried in in a Harrisburg, PA, Federal District Court, “intelligent design” was found Decision in Kitzmiller v. endstream endobj KITZMILLER V. DOVER* by David K. DeWolf,** John G. West,*** and Casey Luskin**** I. endobj 27 0 obj <>stream endstream 238 0 obj <>stream ���3��\�E�{�ƷLq��E��>@�`� ��2���JO5� E+"� PDF of decision hosted on Wikimedia Commons at File:Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District.pdf . KITZMILLER V. DOVER* by David K. DeWolf,** John G. West,*** and Casey Luskin**** I. endstream endstream endstream x�+� � | endobj Taille de cet aperçu JPG pour ce fichier PDF : Ajoutez en une ligne la description de ce que représente ce fichier. 254 0 obj <>stream endstream x����@D��Sj�ܻX,U,�$��†�B0����L&���dPӃv��#�bڌs�gO�yPD�w$���[�Y?�j߼̖M�~V�sIUV��0��1Loh�p���R��lxj� ͘;�..��ߨ�T��"� 174 0 obj <>stream endstream 204 0 obj <>stream Dover Decision ( KB pdf); Kitzmiller Plaintiff’s Brief ( “Intelligent Design” is a religious view, not a scientific theory, according to U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III in his historic decision in Kitzmiller v. endstream x�+� � | endstream 86 0 obj <>stream x�+� � | This study also tried to offer recommendations whereby Intelligent Design might be taught in a public school setting as well as follow-ups for future research. x�+� � | endobj x�+� � | endobj x����@D��Sjܻ,�j�bA%�6����wa2�IN&���tp��X�� �r6���� ��(��a�5������9�o�g5��UnmT%����;��T�U���o�[�8��U^��C��n�mں;�*�G�"� He also ruled that members of Dover's school board lied under oath to hide their religious motivations. x�+� � | 84 0 obj <>stream endstream 42 0 obj <>stream endstream endobj endstream x�+� � | endobj x��?�0���)nԡ�^i�8�80I����`!����[�\r��.��������f�; ߑ N (bo�g9�H�}� Fichier d’origine ‎(1 275 × 1 650 pixels ; taille du fichier : 310 Kio ; type MIME : application/pdf ; 139 pages), https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/PDMCreative Commons Public Domain Mark 1.0falsefalse. endstream : Case No. endstream Judge John E. Jones III, who was nominated by President George W. Bush, made a very strong ruling against intelligent design.He ruled that it is creationism and is not science. endobj endobj endstream x����@D��Sjܻ������$[X�\F >�ߕ�$'9�jz���S1".2/�:Q� �gS%���i�o^f�&i� �¹�*+�s����7�Q�8�p�o��X�yj� �s��Lk��SM?G_"� endstream (1 275 × 1 650 pixels ; taille du fichier : 310 Kio ; type MIME : Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District.pdf, https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/, O:\Jones\Neiburg\Dover Area School District\Final Dover Opinion.wpd, Ajouter une description locale (wikicode), United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. 181 0 obj <>stream its post-trial opinion, however, the court first analyzed Dover’s policy under the endorsement test,15 and only after that did it apply the Lemon test to the policy.16 A. endobj endobj endstream endobj endstream endstream x����@D��Sjܻ,�b�bA%�6����we2�IN&���w��X�� �r6ρ��(��(��a�5����M�94/�c�߈UnmT��9.�g���V�8�w߅�Dq(g�<7�����(���ݨtT�G? 221 0 obj <>stream 228 0 obj <>stream INTRODUCTION The year 2005 was the year the theory of intelligent design (ID) made the headlines. endobj x�+� � | endobj 118 0 obj <>stream endstream endobj x��?�0���)nԡ�^)�8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������3��:'��`s?�j߼̖�j��u� x����@��}�)� v��;-U,�$��†�A0���=�L2ɗ�*z���c�"6d���x��\Qp Bkb%0��is��z�:j~��ڨ,J,:��w���V+8߆�Dq0g+�Խ��;w�tw���N����FC"� endstream 281 0 obj <>stream endobj x�+� � | x��?�0���)n�y���8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h37l�=���ߑ N (b��?�j߼��u�~Vƹ�*+�u����72�p���R�ќ/����1w���Lk��SM? 122 0 obj <>stream 93 0 obj <>stream endstream x��?�0���)n�y���8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h�X��=��A9���H'�7�m?�j߼��u�~Vֹ�*+�u����72�p���R��lxj� U`� Yq���F���~�"� endobj "� 120 0 obj <>stream �"� 55 0 obj <>stream 0[6I�MX�%UY���~�0���Z�q��k|�G8_��D4��7�i�oTz��C�"� x�+� � | endobj endobj endobj x�+� � | 123 0 obj <>stream x����@D��Sj�]�b�bA%�6����wer�IN&���w��X�$t��J.���p=)��4��-�D�C��0;6Q��X�"QUV�縴���o�F��4�}���Vyn��C��u޺��j���"5 endstream endstream endobj endobj endobj endobj 151 0 obj <>stream 194 0 obj <>stream endstream endstream �#A�@�b�����V��`�l����ʭM���_����azC���p���*��l����s��2���JO5� 6"� x�+� � | endstream endstream endobj x��?�0���)n�y���:�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h��\Xߑ N p�7(�~�վy�-��&�rk�����an?c��ȴZ�q��k|KG�Y��c� ��Lk��SM?�"� x��?�0���)n�y���8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h�X��=��A2���H'�7�m?�j߼��u�~Vֹ�*+�u����72�p���R��lxj� ј;HV\���Q驦e"� endobj 63 0 obj <>stream endstream endobj Dover Decision ( KB pdf); Kitzmiller Plaintiff’s Brief ( “Intelligent Design” is a religious view, not a scientific theory, according to U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III in his historic decision in Kitzmiller v. Dover. endobj x�+� � | and the kitzmiller v dover decision that Page 3/29. 275 0 obj <>stream x��?�0���)n�y���8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h�X��=���ߑ N (bo��~�վy�-��&��sIUV��0��1LodZ-�8��5�����,����1w���Lk��SM? endobj ?�j߼��u�~V��IUV��0��1LodZ-�8��5����9_�����A2w���F���~ x����@D��Sjܻ,�b�bA%�6����war�IN&����w��X�� ��l,^=%�a1��:� ��J`r7��м=�u��"V��QUVXr����R�Vq����Vynz�sI��uw*��F�"� 30 0 obj <>stream x�+� � | x��=�@D��Sj�,�*T�\aaC� ����=��d��ɠ�;m18+�����c��4*���$�4VE�p�v���n�F�'b��FuU��ҽ'?��Z����/�-1��/���Qb�!iy���J�����N"7 Kitzmiller, et al. Dover Decision ( KB pdf); Kitzmiller Plaintiff’s Brief ( “Intelligent Design” is a religious view, not a scientific theory, according to U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III in his historic decision in Kitzmiller v. endstream x����@D��Sj�pﲰ����$[X�\F >�ߕ�I&9�jz���1".v^�ux���a�� �g-���i�o^f�F�_źpNUe�s���Ff�"��=\�[�9��"OM �0w�ls���F���~E�"� endobj x�+� � | 107 0 obj <>stream endstream endobj x����@D��Sjܻ,�����$[X�\F >�ߕ�I&9�jz���S�".va�:Q� �gS%����7� �e��߄�q.�� x�+� � | endobj x��?�0���)n�y���8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h�X��=������H'�7�m?�j߼��u�~Vֹ�*+�u����72�p���R��lxj� k1w���Lk��SM?>stream endobj endobj 79 0 obj <>stream endstream endstream x����@D��Sjܻ������$[X�\F >�ߕ�$'9�jz���S1".2/�:q�������7� �e��߄U�\R��9��g�ڨE�{�ƷLq,�<5}�h��El.��ߨ�T�C�"� 270 0 obj <>stream endstream endstream endobj endstream x�+� � | endstream case. endobj v Dover Area School District et al. x�+� � | endstream x�+� � | endstream kitzmiller v dover decision is universally compatible with any devices to read Better to search instead for a particular book title, author, or synopsis. endobj endstream 1 0 obj<> x�+� � | endstream Ce fichier a été identifié comme étant exempt de restrictions connues liées au droit d’auteur, y compris tous les droits connexes et voisins. x�+� � | 188 0 obj <>stream 0[6��*֙s�*+�u����7R�p�����lxj� g1w���Lk��SM?�"� endobj 61 0 obj <>stream endobj x�+� � | 99 0 obj <>stream endobj endstream 132 0 obj <>stream x��?�0���)nԡ�^)�8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������3��;�#A�@P�>C�i�o^f�F�_��:����_����az#5z����-���OM`���i�oTz�� R"� 4 0 obj <>stream endobj 166 0 obj <>stream endobj Below are links to complete transcripts of testimony at the Kitzmiller v. Dover trial. en español In the legal case Kitzmiller v. Dover, tried in in a Harrisburg, PA, Federal District Court, “intelligent design” was found Decision in Kitzmiller v. x�+� � | x��?�0���)n�y��:�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h3/�Xߑ N p��a x�L=�@�߯���q����$� .�����'M�&mS����'oĊ8�4����S|�@�;��B�y�Ï��7� �e�߈M�\T��8��g��5Kp��o�a%�Kxj� I0w��eZ���j��"� endobj x�+� � | x�+� � | endstream 196 0 obj <>stream endstream 121 0 obj <>stream 76 0 obj <>stream 236 0 obj <>stream endobj endstream endobj x�+� � | 239 0 obj <>stream 225 0 obj <>stream endstream endstream endobj 112 0 obj <>stream 80 0 obj <>stream ��3�������_�[���OM��$�eZ���j��"� x�+� � | x��?�0���)nԡ�^)�:�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������3˹�x���g!�#A�@�b�����V��`�lT�U�skUUV��0��1Lo�F/�8��5�%��9[�����ARw���F���~�"� endstream 150 0 obj <>stream endstream 141 0 obj <>stream 115 0 obj <>stream : Case No. The 2005 case of Kitzmiller v. Dover brought before the court the question of teaching Intelligent Design in schools. x��?�0���)n�y���8�80I����`!����[�\r��.�������h�X��=������H'�7�m?�j߼��u�~Vֹ�*+�u����72�p���R��lxj� g1w���Lk��SM? 262 0 obj <>stream 199 0 obj <>stream endobj 142 0 obj <>stream �;��g����{��o���<5}��1w�ls���F���~C�"� j"� endobj Dieu), mais un « designer » . x�+� � | endstream 97 0 obj <>stream endobj x�+� � | 75 0 obj <>stream endstream endobj endstream endstream 269 0 obj <>stream 272 0 obj <>stream x��=�0���WܨC�o)�pTq`�����B0���[�\r�s�CM�����.ea�ux���o�